The latest news, official guidance, analysis, jobs, and more.

BenefitsLink.com logo EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com logo

Retirement Plans Newsletter

February 13, 2023

[Official Guidance]

Text of EBSA Notice Reopening Comment Period on Proposed Amendment and Restatement of Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program

"This document reopens the comment period with respect to amendments to the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program [VFCP] ... and to the proposed amendment to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2002-51 , both published in the Federal Register on November 21, 2022. [EBSA] ... solicited comment from interested persons by January 20, 2023. On December 29, 2022, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, which includes a provision pertaining to the VFC Program, was signed into law. The Department is reopening the comment period to allow commenters to address any issues raised by the new statutory provision."   MORE >>

Employee Benefits Security Administration [EBSA], U.S. Department of Labor [DOL]

[Official Guidance]

PBGC Opens Special Financial Assistance Application Period for Plans in Priority Group 6

"On February 11, 2023, PBGC will begin accepting applications for Special Financial Assistance for eligible plans in  Priority Group 6 . Priority Group 6 includes those plans for which PBGC projects a present value of financial assistance payments under section 4261 of ERISA that would exceed $1 billion in the absence of SFA."   MORE >>

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation [PBGC]

[Guidance Overview]

The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022: Federal Agencies' Required Actions and Stakeholder Reports

"Here are the seven SECURE 2.0 required reports or actions to be taken or that are due from the federal agencies that provide insight to key stakeholders about the state of U.S. retirement policy and the need for such guidance."   MORE >>

Milliman

[Guidance Overview]

SECURE 2.0 Provides New and Expanded Retirement Plan Correction Rules

"[T]his new rule would permit self-correction of most plan issues without any IRS filing.... SECURE 2.0 provides that retirement plan fiduciaries are not required to attempt to recover inadvertent benefit overpayments made to participants or beneficiaries and includes additional requirements if the responsible plan fiduciary does attempt to recover overpayments[.]"   MORE >>

Verrill Dana LLP

[Guidance Overview]

SECURE 2.0: Oops! So the Employer-Sponsored Retirement Plan Overpaid?

"SECURE 2.0 provides plan fiduciaries with additional options for handling retirement plan overpayments. They may seek recoupment subject to the statutory guardrails in place or choose to forgo recoupment and be able to avoid a breach of fiduciary duty, provided prudent procedures were in place to avoid overpayments."   MORE >>

Ogletree Deakins

[Guidance Overview]

SECURE 2.0 RMD Change Could Cause Trouble in States with Certain Unclaimed Property Laws

"In Kentucky, Maine, Colorado and Nevada, individual retirement accounts are considered abandoned if they are unclaimed three years after the participant turns age 70.5, which was the RMD age prior to the first SECURE Act, passed in 2019. After 2033, therefore, if participants wait until age 75 before taking the RMD, their IRAs could be considered abandoned when they hit age 73.5, absent any legislative change from their respective states."   MORE >>

PLANSPONSOR; free registration may be required

[Guidance Overview]

PBGC (Slightly) Opens Door to Exceptions from Special Withdrawal Liability Rules for SFA Multiemployer Pension Plans

"In response to a comment from a multiemployer pension fund with an alternative withdrawal liability allocation method ... that the requirement to use mass withdrawal assumptions and to phase-in SFA as a plan asset could incentivize employers to withdraw in some cases, the PBGC added a process for plans to request exceptions from those requirements under narrow circumstances. The details of the process are outlined in the update to the final regulations."   MORE >>

Proskauer

[Guidance Overview]

CRS in Focus: DOL Guidance and Regs on Selecting Private-Sector Pension Plan Investments

"The fiduciary standards in [ERISA] require that individuals who make decisions for private-sector pension plans (referred to as fiduciaries) adhere to specified standards of conduct.... Over the years, investors -- including pension plan sponsors and participants -- have taken an interest in investment features beyond the standard risk and return relationship ... Policymakers' opinions vary as to the appropriateness of these types of investments within pension plans." [IF12328 Feb. 10, 2023]   MORE >>

Congressional Research Service [CRS]

[Guidance Overview]

CRS Report: Social Security -- The Windfall Elimination Provision

21 pages. "In December 2022, about 2.0 million people (or about 3% of all Social Security beneficiaries) were affected by the WEP.... Recent legislation has generally proposed either to eliminate the provision for all or some affected beneficiaries, or replace the current-law provision with a new proportional formula based on past earnings from both covered and noncovered employment." [98-35 updated Feb. 13, 2023]   MORE >>

Congressional Research Service [CRS]

Appellate Court Says Arbitration Clause Can’t Bar ERISA Claims

"[T]his decision leaves the matter of enforceability of these arbitration clauses in a bit of a muddle.... [T]he Second, Sixth, and Seventh circuits have recently issued rulings allowing these cases to stay in court, while the Ninth Circuit has previously granted Charles Schwab Corporation's bid for arbitration over its retirement plan investments." [ Harrison v. Envision Mgmt. Holding, Inc. Bd. of Directors , No. 22-1098 (10th Cir. Feb. 9, 2023)]   MORE >>

American Retirement Association [ARA]

State-Sponsored Retirement Plans: A Look at Participation

"[One study] shows that 70% of employees don't want to save in a state-run plan,... [B]etween May and August 2022, 33% to 37.5% of eligible, auto-enrolled employees opted out of participating in CalSavers.... There is a disconnect between the low interest ... and participation figures, at least from California, where more than 60% of the automatically enrolled employees stay in CalSavers."   MORE >>

American Retirement Association [ARA]

Employee Benefits Jobs

View job as Education Consultant
            for Pentegra

Education Consultant

Pentegra

Remote / West Harrison NY

View job as Education Consultant for Pentegra

View job as Compliance Analyst
            for FuturePlan, by Ascensus

Compliance Analyst

FuturePlan, by Ascensus

Remote / Chicago IL

View job as Compliance Analyst for FuturePlan, by Ascensus

View job as Compliance Analyst
            for FuturePlan, by Ascensus

Compliance Analyst

FuturePlan, by Ascensus

Remote / Los Angeles CA

View job as Compliance Analyst for FuturePlan, by Ascensus

View job as Compliance Analyst
            for FuturePlan, by Ascensus

Compliance Analyst

FuturePlan, by Ascensus

Remote

View job as Compliance Analyst for FuturePlan, by Ascensus

View job as Compliance Analyst
            for FuturePlan, by Ascensus

Compliance Analyst

FuturePlan, by Ascensus

Remote / New York NY

View job as Compliance Analyst for FuturePlan, by Ascensus

View job as Compliance Analyst
            for FuturePlan, by Ascensus

Compliance Analyst

FuturePlan, by Ascensus

Remote / Philadelphia PA

View job as Compliance Analyst for FuturePlan, by Ascensus

View job as Compliance Analyst
            for FuturePlan, by Ascensus

Compliance Analyst

FuturePlan, by Ascensus

Remote / San Francisco CA

View job as Compliance Analyst for FuturePlan, by Ascensus

Selected New Discussions

Use of Qualified 401(a) Non-Electing Church Plan Assets to Indemnify Church Employees/Directors

"Would it be a problem under any federal law (e.g., IRC 401(a)(2) Exclusive Benefit Rule, IRC 503 prohibited transaction rules…) for a qualified 401(a) non-electing church plan to add a provision to its plan (and 501(a) trust agreement) to provide for indemnification of the board members and employees who administer the plan against liability (except in the cases of willful or wanton conduct, gross negligence, and gross malfeasance), with such indemnification to be payable from its plan assets. Assume that there are no state law issues to consider (focus is on federal law). Of course, since it’s a non-electing church plan, it is exempt from ERISA. Any specific or general thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!"

BenefitsLink Message Boards

Use of Qualified 401(a) Governmental Plan Assets to Indemnify Governmental Employees/Directors

"Would it be a problem under any federal law (e.g., IRC 401(a)(2) Exclusive Benefit Rule, IRC 503 prohibited transaction rules…) for a qualified 401(a) governmental plan to add a provision to its plan (and 501(a) trust agreement) to provide for indemnification of the board members and employees who administer the plan against liability (except in the cases of willful or wanton conduct, gross negligence, and gross malfeasance), with such indemnification to be payable from its plan assets. Assume that there are no state law issues to consider (focus is on federal law). Of course, since it’s a governmental plan, it is exempt from ERISA. Any specific or general thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!"

BenefitsLink Message Boards

Plan Termination and SECURE 2.0 Amendments

"Since terminating plans are forced to amend for compliance even though 'regular' plans have a greatly extended remedial amendment compliance period, seems like this may be a challenge. Coming up with a comprehensive plan termination amendment is quite a tough assignment. Any thoughts about how reasonable the IRS may be about a 'good faith' plan termination SECURE 2.0 Amendment? I'd like to think that any 'reasonable' attempt at such an amendment would be a case of, 'Pass, Friend' without any minute scrutiny for perfection."

BenefitsLink Message Boards

945 Withholding

"Client has not paid withholding due on participant distribution for 2022. Client received the 20% check from the financial instition, didn't ask anyone what check was for, and deposited into the business checking account. As I was completing Form 945, asked client for dates paid and she tells me it hasn't been. I have called the payment in with EFTPS before, I assume payments made online handled similarly, but 945 withholding. Question is, do we need a separate PIN to make a 945 payment? Accountant tells me the client pays all 941 through EFTPS; accountant has no idea how payments are made with 945, which I find incredible."

BenefitsLink Message Boards

Webcasts and Conferences(Retirement Plans / Executive Compensation)

Deciphering SECURE 2.0 for Your DC Plan

March 1, 2023 WEBINAR

Pensions & Investments

Last Issue's Most Popular Items

Unsubscribe   |   Change Email Address

Search Past Issues   |   Privacy Policy

Submit an Article   |   Contact Us   |   Advertise Here

Copyright 2023 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.

BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.

Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.

View Site in Mobile | Classic
Share by: