The latest news, official guidance, analysis, jobs, and more.

BenefitsLink.com logo EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com logo

Retirement Plans Newsletter

July 21, 2023

[Guidance Overview]

The Best Interest Standard for Recommending Account Types

"[T]he SEC imposes a best interest standard on account recommendations by broker-dealers.... The DOL also imposes a best interest standard under its prohibited transaction exemption 2020-02 , which allows broker-dealers and their registered representatives to receive conflicted compensation resulting from non-discretionary fiduciary investment advice about a change of account types for a retirement plan or an IRA. To satisfy these rules, broker-dealers ... need to understand what constitutes an 'account type' and the best interest standard for recommending one."   MORE >>

Faegre Drinker

Investment Firm to Pay $124 Million to Settle 401(k) Plan Mismanagement Allegations

"Investment management firm Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc. will pay more than $124.6 million to settle lawsuits filed by the [DOL] and private plaintiffs that alleged the firm improperly managed a 401(k) plan sponsored by DST Systems ... The agency sued Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb in 2019 alleging that the firm used a 'self-proclaimed investment strategy of 'non-diversification'' that resulted in losses for the plan's more than 9,000 participants."   MORE >>

HR Dive

Verizon Settles 401(k) Complaint for $30 Million

"Verizon Communications Inc. has agreed to pay $30 million to settle a complaint from 2016 related to allegations of an underperforming hedge fund in its retirement plan target-date funds.... [Plaintiffs has alleged that] Verizon and its employee benefits committee failing to uphold its fiduciary duty in monitoring the performance of a hedge fund called the Global Opportunity Fund and not taking 'corrective action regarding the Fund despite obvious and long-term underperformance.' " [Jacobs v. Verizon Communications Inc., No. 16-1082 (S.D.N.Y. prop. settlement agrmt. filed Jul. 7, 2023)]   MORE >>

planadviser

DOL Rule on Abandoned Retirement Plans Arrives at OMB

"The [DOL] rule will likely make it easier to wind down pension plans abandoned when the employer shuts down or a small-business owner dies. The department has been trying to address major problems in the abandoned plan process for years ... The current process allows court-appointed trustees to claim high fees from the plans and financial institutions to delay resolution, she says."   MORE >>

ThinkAdvisor

SECURE 2.0 Brings Changes for 403(b)s Around Access to Collective Investment Trusts

"CITs are leveraging the idea of providing the plan participants with an advantage for pooling their retirement assets ... In the wake of Secure Act 2.0, the foundations for a path that will allow CIT's to be utilized within 403(b) plans have been established but are still incomplete."   MORE >>

OneDigital

Compensation, Bonuses, and Other Factors Can Make or Break an ESOP

"When valuing controlling ownership interests, valuation analysts often restate above- or below-market items (compensation, bonuses, rent, etc.) to a fair market level to reflect what a hypothetical buyer would pay.... If you reduce executive compensation for valuation purposes, the share price increases, putting a heavier burden on the company when you redeem shares. The company, which already has reduced income from paying above-market executive compensation, may struggle to redeem shares at the established price."   MORE >>

Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker, LLC

The Uneasy State of U.S. Retirement Saving Today

"Participation among workers with access to 401(k) plans has jumped over the past five years from 72 percent to 83 percent in 2022 ... Some credit goes to the growing popularity among employers of automatically enrolling workers in their plans.... [O]nly about half of the people earning less than $30,000 were saving last year, compared with more than 90 percent of people earning over $100,000. "   MORE >>

Center for Retirement Research at Boston College

Employee Benefits Jobs

View job as Retirement Plan Sales Executive
            for Primark Benefits

Retirement Plan Sales Executive

Primark Benefits

San Mateo CA / Hybrid

View job as Retirement Plan Sales Executive for Primark Benefits

View job as DC Plan Consultant/Administrator
            for Dynamic Pension Services, Inc.

DC Plan Consultant/Administrator

Dynamic Pension Services, Inc.

Remote / Dayton OH

View job as DC Plan Consultant/Administrator for Dynamic Pension Services, Inc.

View job as Litigation Attorney
            for Trucker Huss, APC

Litigation Attorney

Trucker Huss, APC

CA

View job as Litigation Attorney for Trucker Huss, APC

Selected New Discussions

DFVC Program After Late Filed 5500

"Accountant filed the 6/30/2021 5500 late to stop the running of penalties. Do you think it can be refiled under DFVC program with outstanding 2022 5500 now since no notice has been received yet?"

BenefitsLink Message Boards

Roth Catch-Up Contribution

"When complying with the new Roth Catch-Up Contribution provision of SECURE Act 2.0, do plan sponsors need to add Roth as an available option for all participants in the plan? It seems like they should, however we work with a plan sponsor that does not want to make it an available contribution type in the plan. Is that permissable?"

BenefitsLink Message Boards

Pooled Plan - Employer Contribution Funding

"In 2022, a 401(k)/PSP client transferred from a pooled account to individual accounts as Vanguard. During the first part of the year, they funded deferrals and also made additional deposits to the account which were used to fund the employer safe harbor match at year-end. The safe harbor match amounts were not calculated based upon a specific time period or earmarked for any specific participant, This is how they had always done it and I see no harm in it. Those employer deposits throughout the year earned money while in the pooled account. After the transfer to Vanguard, these funds were placed in a suspense account and continued to have earnings. The total suspense account, which was comprised of actual money deposited + earnings, was used to fund the annual safe harbor match once it had been calculated based upon full year data. Is it ok that they use the earnings to fund the required safe harbor match contribution? I assume they definitely cannot deduct the earnings portion because they did not deposit it, but am now questioning the use of the earnings altogether to fund the contribution. If we were talking about forfeitures, I know those earnings are used to fund contributions all the time, but is this different?"

BenefitsLink Message Boards

Webcasts and Conferences(Retirement Plans / Executive Compensation)

Actuaries Working with TPAs???

RECORDED

American Society of Enrolled Actuaries [ASEA]

Benefits of QDIA Re-Enrollment

July 25, 2023 WEBINAR

Broadridge

Last Issue's Most Popular Items

Unsubscribe   |   Change Email Address

Search Past Issues   |   Privacy Policy

Submit an Article   |   Contact Us   |   Advertise Here

Copyright 2023 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.

BenefitsLink® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.

Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.

View Site in Mobile | Classic
Share by: