The latest news, official guidance, analysis, jobs, and more.

Retirement Plans Newsletter

April 30, 2024

[Guidance Overview]

QPAM Exemption Amendment: Key Takeaways and Action Steps for Advisors and Other Stakeholders

"The Amendment will make the QPAM Exemption more difficult to rely upon, and, as a result, fewer asset managers may be able to qualify as QPAMs ... A one-time notice to DOL may not be a difficult condition, but overlooking this condition or failing to update the notice in a timely manner when an entity changes its name could result in the QPAM Exemption not being available. The notice requirement effectively eliminates the ability of advisers to rely on the QPAM exemption retroactively[.]"   MORE >>

K&L Gates

[Sponsor]

Register Now: ERISA at 50 -- Where Employee Benefits Law is Headed

Join WEB Network's webinar on June 20: panelists who have been involved with ERISA since its early days will discuss why and how ERISA was adopted, the growth of employee protections over the years, and how ERISA might be further expanded.

Sponsored by WEB Network

[Guidance Overview]

Effect on Private Funds of Recent DOL Amendments to ERISA's QPAM Exemption (PDF)

"Although certain private funds may be structured to avoid holding 'plan assets,' ... those funds may have agreed in a contract ... to utilize the QPAM Exemption in certain circumstances.... Prior to the effective date [these funds should:] [1] Review all fund documentation including side letters and ISDAs/derivative contracts....[2] Consider DOL notification requirements in light of the September 15, 2024 notification deadline ... [3] Does the fund have sufficient assets under management and capitalization to qualify under the QPAM Exemption in light of the Amendments' requirements? [4] Consider recordkeeping requirements.... [5] Has the fund or any affiliate committed prohibited misconduct under the expanded requirements?"   MORE >>

Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP

[Guidance Overview]

Impact of the New Fiduciary Rule on 401(k) Plan Sponsors

"While the direct impact on 401k plan sponsors may be negligible, the new Fiduciary Rule will affect the vendors hired by plan sponsors. It will be up to the plan sponsors to vet those vendors in light of the new Rule.... Plan sponsors will need to inspect how they document and verify anything that regulators might determine to be a self-dealing transaction.... The new Rule will bring the process for [placing annuities in 401k plans] under more scrutiny.... [D]ocumentation and disclosure procedures will need updating.... The issue gets more complex for rollovers."   MORE >>

Fiduciary News; free registration required

University 403(b) Excessive Fee, Fiduciary Breach Suit Sacked -- Again

"This would appear to be yet another case where the folks bringing suit failed (at least in the opinion of the judges hearing their case) to persuade based on the facts presented that there had been an injury, and that they, therefore, had standing to sue. " [ Wilcox v. Georgetown Univ. , No. 23-7059 (D.C. Cir. Apr. 23, 2024)]   MORE >>

National Tax-Deferred Savings Association [NTSA]

Corporate Pension Plans Are Healthier Than Ever

"The publicly traded U.S. companies with the 100 largest defined benefit plans can now boast an average funding ratio of 99.9% as of Dec. 31 ... That's a slight drop from the average ratio of 100.2% in the [same] analysis a year earlier, but it still represents a level of stability for funding among corporate pension plans not seen in years. While not all the 100 measured plans are fully funded, 49 had funding ratios of 100% or more as of Dec. 31, and 30 plans even have funding ratios of 110% or more."   MORE >>

Pensions & Investments

GAO Report on 401(k) Retirement Plans: DOL Should Update Guidance on Target Date Funds

"The [DOL], the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and the [SEC] oversee TDFs through disclosure requirements, enforcement, and examinations. But DOL's guidance has not been updated and lacks detail. For example, DOL developed guidance in 2010 for participants and in 2013 for plan sponsors to help them select TDFs. However, the guidance does not include recent developments such as the increase of TDFs structured as collective investment trusts." [GAO-24-105364 pub. Mar 28, 2024; rel. Apr 29, 2024]   MORE >>

U.S. Government Accountability Office [GAO]

ESOP Community Awaits DOL Regulation on Valuation

"Although it remains to be seen what form the DOL regulation will take, and whether it will create new risks for ESOP transactions, most practitioners in the field are anticipating this guidance will resolve basic issues about valuation process and methodology, clearing the way for more ESOP transactions."   MORE >>

Kaufman & Canoles, P.C.

Plan Sponsors Focused on Reining in Fees

"Callan's recently released 2024 Defined Contribution (DC) Trends Survey ... found top areas of focus for DC plan sponsors include plan governance and process, investment management fees, and administration fees. Fiduciary initiatives in 2023 centered on reviewing plan fees, the investment policy statement, and the investment structure -- things the survey found will also be top areas of focus in 2024, with reviewing plan fees as the highest priority (74%)."   MORE >>

401(k) Specialist

[Opinion]

Massachusetts District Court Allows Trial on Fiduciary Imprudence Claims Despite a Deliberate Fiduciary Process

"Under this court's ruling, ERISA is not a law of process as designed, but a liability trap that allows the trial bar to challenge any process-based decision they think can be leveraged into settlements and legal fees. This case ... should inform plan sponsors that they face increased liability if they retain investments placed on a watchlist for even a single quarter. Plan sponsors are also at a higher risk of liability if they retain investments that are challenged in other excess fee cases, even if those lawsuits are meritless." [ Sellers v. Trustees of Boston College , No. 22-10912 (D. Mass Apr. 11, 2024)]   MORE >>

Encore Fiduciary

[Opinion]

There's No Evidence of a Retirement Crisis

"For several decades, people worried about future retirees have argued their case based on broad trends, such as the waning of defined-benefit plans, surveys suggesting that workers don't own enough investment assets, and the ever-increasing length of retirement as Americans live longer. Those are all worthwhile topics, but they represent questions to be addressed, not answers to be delivered. To put the matter another way, unless they are accompanied by specific supporting evidence, demographic arguments are insufficient."   MORE >>

John Rekenthaler, via Morningstar

Benefits in General

Responding to Employee Questions About the FTC's Noncompete Ban

"Employers who rely on noncompete agreements to protect their legitimate business interests will no doubt face questions from employees concerning the continued enforceability of those restrictions following the FTC's promulgated rule  ... [This article provides] Q&A talking points for employers to address employee questions.... [E]mployers should evaluate alternative protective measures and utilize a 'belt and suspenders' approach to the protection of their interests."   MORE >>

ArentFox Schiff LLP

An Employer's Practical Guide to the FTC's Non-Compete Rule

"Employers should start identifying the workers who may need to receive notice if the Rule goes into effect and consider the logistics of making notice.... [E]xisting non-competes with senior executives will remain enforceable after the Rule goes into effect.... Employers should ... evaluate less restrictive measures that they either now have available or may need to implement should the Rule go into effect.... [E]ven if the Rule is delayed or struck down by the United States Supreme Court, state legislatures or Congress may be prompted to adopt restrictions on non-competes."   MORE >>

McDonald Hopkins

Executive Compensation and Nonqualified Plans

Determining the Treatment of Performance-Vesting Equity Awards in M&A Transactions

"The analysis for how best to treat performance-vesting awards in connection with a corporate transaction can be multifaceted and will vary deal by deal depending on the facts and circumstances.... ... Should unvested awards be accelerated at closing?  ... Can the existing performance goals be modified or adjusted to continue to apply postclosing? ... How is the performance level measured?"   MORE >>

Morgan Lewis

Employee Benefits Jobs

View job as Sr. Actuary for EGPS

Sr. Actuary

EGPS

Remote / Franklin Square NY

View job as Sr. Actuary for EGPS

View job as ERISA Attorney for Great Gray Trust

ERISA Attorney

Great Gray Trust

Boston MA / Las Vegas NV / Wilmington DE / Hybrid

View job as ERISA Attorney for Great Gray Trust

Selected New Discussions

Employees of Related (But Not CG) Second Employer Permitted to Participate Before Second Employer Formally Adopts Plan

"Employer A adopts a plan, effective 1/1/2023. Employer B's employees are allowed to participate in employer A's plan. Here's the problem. The owners of A also have ownership in B, but NOT sufficient to constitute a Controlled Group. Nor are the businesses an Affiliated Services Group. And although A's plan provides for Multiple Employer Plan provisions, employer B did NOT sign any type of participation agreement/joinder agreement, etc., as required under the MEP provisions in A's plan. [In a] webcast re IRS Notice 2023-43, this question came up in the context of a CG/ASG, where the related employer did not adopt the plan. The presenters' opinions were that although 2023-43 does not allow self-correction of failure to initially adopt a plan, because the plan had been adopted by the 'employer' under the CG/ASG rules, that this is an operational failure that can be self-corrected. Although it is a 'no harm no foul' type of situation, I feel like extending this treatment to a situation where the employer *(B in this case) is not 'related' under the CG/ASG rules may be stretching the point too far. Curious as to any thoughts you may have?"

BenefitsLink Message Boards

Press Releases

Webcasts and Conferences(Retirement Plans / Executive Compensation)

Last Issue's Most Popular Items

DOL Finalizes Fiduciary Advice Rule

October Three Consulting

Unsubscribe   |   Change Email Address

Search Past Issues   |   Privacy Policy

Submit an Article   |   Contact Us   |   Advertise Here

Copyright 2024 BenefitsLink.com, Inc. All materials contained in this newsletter are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of third party materials, the owner of those materials. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notices from copies of the content.

BenefitsLink ® Retirement Plans Newsletter, ISSN no. 1536-9587.

Links to web sites other than BenefitsLink.com and EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com are offered as a service to our readers. We are not involved in their production and are not responsible for their content.

View Site in Mobile | Classic
Share by: